Heartwarming Photos Show a Lion Nursing an Orphaned Leopard Cub. Earlier this week, a remarkable scene played out at Tanzania’s Ngorongoro Conservation Area. An orphaned leopard cub, desperate for a meal, approached a lioness who happened to be lactating. It’s a rare—and extremely precious—example of cross- species nursing in the wild. The pics were taken on Tuesday, and they show a five- year- old lioness nursing a leopard cub estimated to be just three weeks old. Incredibly, the lioness, named Nosikitok, seemed to be okay with the tiny interloper. This lioness is known to have recently given birth to her own cubs, which is a critical factor. She is physiologically primed to take care of baby cats, and the little leopard fits the bill—it is almost exactly the age of her own cubs and physically very similar to them.”Hunter says Nosikitok, who’s wearing a GPS collar for tracking purposes, wouldn’t be nursing the cub if she “wasn’t already awash with a ferocious maternal drive,” which he says is typical of lionesses.“Even so, there has never been another case like it, and why it has occurred now is mystifying. It is quite possible she has lost her own cubs, and found the leopard cub in her bereaved state when she would be particularly vulnerable,” he wrote. It seems like a match made in heaven, except that it probably isn’t. The leopard cub’s future prospects look bleak, according to Hunter. And in fact, the cub was nowhere to be seen the day after the pictures were taken. Science. Now is reporting that marine biologists working in the Azorean archipelago of the Northern. ![]() ![]() Examples include sperm whales who adopted a deformed dolphin, a dog who nursed a baby squirrel, apes who treat cats like babies, and a domestic cat that adopted a trio of bobcat kittens. Social companionship in some cases may actually be enough of a benefit so long as it is not outweighed by competition . Kotaku. Luke Plunkett is a Contributing Editor based in Canberra, Australia. He has written a book on cosplay, designed a game about airplanes, and also runs cosplay. D Movie Reviews by Studio 3. D3. D MOVIE REVIEWSONE TO FIVE STARSUntil 2. D movies could only be seen (via film) in Theme Parks or at IMAX theaters. Digital projection allowed high quality stereo projection, mostly in circular polarized format (contrary to popular belief, 1. D movies were also polarized- but linear, not circular) with silver screens. In 2. 01. 5 IMAX began showing laser 3. D projection with Dolby dichroic glasses: beautiful bright image with zero ghosting or rivalry. One confession: I LOVE good computer graphics. The ability to create such very realistic worlds and creatures is unprecedented in movie- making.. Of course, the fact that CG lends itself to stereoscopic rendering is a major bonus! Hair, skin, fur, reflections, transparencies.. I may well be prone to grade CG films higher than live action. Also: I really do not like the grossly violent films like Saw and other torture porn. These movies do lend themselves to 3. D treatment, but I'm likely to avoid them. Another important consideration is whether a film has been converted from 2. I’m very bad at processing my feelings alone. If I don’t want to spiral into anxiety, I need to process with a conversation partner: my wife, my friends, my. That price gets you into one movie showing every single day at any theater in the U.S. Mortality theme in Life of Pi book, analysis of theme of Mortality. A boy, a tiger and a boat. These are the main elements of "Life of Pi," the 127-minute Ang Lee film, released this week, that many are hailing as a masterpiece and a. Lost Sphear, the next JRPG from the makers of I Am Setsuna, will be out on January 23, 2018, publisher Square Enix said today. It’ll get a simultaneous launch on.
D. Live action is much more difficult to shoot in 3. D than it is to render CG (computer graphics) into stereo. Therefore, conversion is an expensive ($1. Cameron said it was . DIGITAL - IMAX 3. D - THEME PARK 3. D - Blu- Ray DVD - Netflix. DIGITAL Theater Projection. All movies were seen in Real. D, unless otherwise indicated! DR. STRANGE Four and a half stars - 2. Disney/Marvel. The opening MARVEL logo sequence was a giant stereoscopic step up from earlier version, and a clue that this movie was going to rock in 3. D- and it sure did! We now have another film that should be recommended to skeptics, because if this one doesn't sell stereo, nothing will! Solid story and good characters with special effects that are absolutely jaw- dropping. Apparently a 3. D conversion, but I noticed quite a few stereo credits.. Academy awards should go to the amazing architectural transformations and fractal designs.. Story- wise there were some slow scenes, but overall the film had a good pace and bold visuals. BILLY LYNN'S LONG HALF TIME WALK Three stars - 2. Sony(Special 4. 00 mile round trip to NYC to see Ang Lee's experiment in digital technology with the world's first 3. D 4. K HFR/1. 20fps movie.) Though the stereo was as bright and ghost- free as I've ever seen, the super- crispness of the movie was undeniably distracting. The movie itself was rather mediocre- I found myself paying attention to details: how amazingly sharp the herringbone pattern is on his suit! Are his eyes really that bloodshed, and his lips really that maroon? Usually pans in a 3. D movie stutter badly, but these pans were incredibly smooth.. ![]() Is it not possible to have smooth stereo pans without the ultra- cold video look that takes us out of the cinematic movie experience? Is it that we are used to our movies looking as they have for so long? There were several scenes that did look ? The film had almost no perceptible special effects- it was much more a documentary of a real man's life than a super- hero fantasy. In that respect it was probably a good choice for this tangible treatment. Apparently we saw varying frame rates throughout the film.. Incredibly, few will likely ever see the movie in this format: it's only running for a week in two US theaters, then a normal release. And the disc release will not feature HFR 4. K 3. D anytime soon.. STORKS Two stars - 2. Warner Bros. The 1. First, the stereo was really thin, and hardly utilized (there was a paddle ball sequence, using a cute bird- but too quick to be effective). Second, the story really made no sense (mailed letters become babies?) and the characters were hardly endearing (especially the annoying . The girl builds a flying saucer by herself (with inflatable boat)? Urine on the seat (did he actually say that) and internal bleeding? Baby laughs at violence? Huge carnival on roof (for signal to stork)? The wolves making themselves into bridges and vehicles was somewhat amusing (though ridiculous). Usually CG animations at least have plenty of eye candy, but there was very little here (nice design in the scene of the boy under his bedsheet tent). Very not funny, but I'll admit a few chuckles were elicited (funny idea of a fight while trying to not wake the baby). Even the LEGO . First, two strings? The quest was for.. But that seemed pretty inconsequential.. Scenes seemed to drag on and on.. At least the Beetle character added some attempts at levity.. It's amazing that this is . In fact, I think I'd prefer purely CG imaging, as the sets and characters were good, but could have been much better. The stereoscopic aspect of this movie was really poor- the parallax was very thin, could easily have been doubled. Naturally, the movie is getting very good reviews. THE SECRET LIFE OF PETS Three and a half stars - 2. Illumination Pictures. Pixar had Toy Story(s). Illumination had Despicable Me(s). Neither studio ever managed to replicate their original brilliance.. Illumination tried to capitalize on the popularity of the minion characters with their own movie- but as funny as they are, they're only supporting players. This totally new . The animation and overall design were great, but character design somewhat disappointing. A few laughs, and a few brilliant sequences including the clothesline alley and the sausage factory. Looking forward to Despicable Me 3.. FINDING DORY Two and a half stars - 2. Disney/Pixar. Another misfire from Pixar that everyone else seems to love. Was it funny? I didn't really hear a lot of laughs in the full house (though there was applause at the end) and I gave up just a single chuckle. Characters were rather mudane, and the . The animation can't be called spectacular, as swimming fish are relatively obvious. I found the constant ? The short, . Perfect music by genius Adrian Belew (his first film score, I believe). GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY Three stars - 2. Marvel/Disney Perhaps my expectations were too high for this very popular film, but I thought the script was juvenile (. The characters were interesting enough (especially the tree- man Groot) and there were some excellent stereo scenes. Movie seemed very long, with a mildly amusing coda. GODZILLA Three stars - 2. Warner Bros. Rarely find myself going out to the theatre for 3. D since I can buy the Blu- Ray for just a bit more.. A friend wanted to see this one, so off we went- and the theatre had big electroic cushy seating! That was nice.. The movie certainly was a spectacle, and the converted (by Stereo. D) 3. D looked excellent. However, I found the pace slow and the story way too convenient (wife moves to San Francisco, guess where the monsters go? Hero defuses bombs for military, guess is needed for the big ending?) and the characters not engaging. Some montrous special FX, but few ! And it really is entertaining.. Though this makes actual character animation virtually impossible, the Legos (and faces) were animated extremely cleverly (ocean waves!). D worked well, with an unexpected twist at the end. THE HOBBIT: Desolation of Smaug Three and a half stars - 2. New Line/Warner Bros. Loads of stunning visuals, but throughout the adventure the dwarfs and the elves who are helping them manage to avoid and/or kill dozens of seriously nasty orks (as well as the giant talking fire- breathing dragon) with hardly a scratch or burn (yeah, one arrow hits- big story point!). Again, the characters are cool to look at but really lacking personality- not one adding sorely needed comic relief. The romance seemed improbable. Movie was long, and it seemed it.. Loved 4. 8fps smoothing out the 3. D motion- wish all (3. D) movies had high frame rates. FROZEN Three and a half stars - 2. Disney. The opening short . The feature presentation's art direction was just spectacular, with ice and snow being utilized in stereo space like never before. Good writing, good (but not memorable, except maybe the comic relief snowman) characters, and well exectured songs and music. Though corny at times, this was certainly Disney doing what it should- quality animation that appeals to . I enjoyed a good number of laughs, as did the little girl in the seat next to me.. What was I thinking? It could have been that I was sitting next to an 8 year old girl, likely the prime demographic! This time around there were no laughs, and the sing- songs were just too syrupy Disney. The most amusing segment was the snowman's song about summer.. Certainly the art direction and animation is worth another look, however. Too bad Disney again allows no stereo still frame.. The story is cliche, the writing has little heart or real humor, and the character animation is minimal: there is not much to animate on a plane (or truck or car) except the deflated decal eyes or anthropormophic mouth. The ocean storm scene was ok, but nothing new. Not a memorable scene in the film. Not even a short beforehand.. Is it just about merchandising? PERCY JACKSON Sea of Monsters Three stars - 2. Fox 2. 00. 0Percy Who? Turns out to be modern people living with mythical creatures. Percy is a . The dialogue was juvenile but the creatures were ok, especially the . Overall, the converted 3. D was well done- the highlight was a short prophecy/fantasy sequence (also seemingly out of context) featuring what appeared to be animated stained glass. A memorable (but dumb) line from this 3. D movie: Cyclops says . Robert Downey Jr. He's intense, and he's got the perfect physique to make it real. Jackman serves the story with human interest as well as hardcore fighting. Memorable scenes include the battle on the bullet train and Wolverine dragging dozens of corded arrows in his back- 3. D worked beautifully. Lots of well choreographed martial arts and swordplay. Stereo. D conversion- excellent as usual. Enjoyed the movie, but do I want to see it again? Probably not. DESPICABLE ME 2 Five stars - 2. Illumination Entertainment. Perfection. Brilliant from start to finish.. LOVED this cinematic animated masterpiece! Every element was superb! Great characters, story, design, sound, lighting, writing..
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |